Parrot Palin

May 19, 2009 – 6:50 pm

improv music video Sarah Palin McCain John Bristol Hockey Mama for Obama Obama Singing Hockey Mom Evita Argentina moose piano The Vet Who Did Not Vet A Dr. Seuss style telling of the McCain and Palin tale. John McCain Sarah Palin Humor Animation Vet Satire Funny Politics Election Rhyme Suess Sarah Palin John Cleese Monty Python Michael Parrot spamalot seesmic vinvin whit scott Jeremey Lavoi seesmic.com Wink Maverick Hockey Mom Palin-ism Web Comedy Video Political Campaign Humor Tina Fey SNL …

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  1. 25 Responses to “Parrot Palin”

  2. I can’t speak to cities being full of the young and non-religious. I can only speak to what I know, and I did grow up with many, many welfare mothers. Poor, 3rd generation welfare mothers.

    Like yesterday I remember those nieghborhood pastors screaming, “This time the Democrats are going to make it right!” Every fucking election day they’d trott out my friends and relatives and load them on the voting buses to vote themselves a little more dole.

    Heard it my whole life, nothing has changed.

    By Pappy76248 on May 19, 2009

  3. Dems exploiting the poor? That’s a big one.

    You know you might have been right if you had said something in the lines of… Big cities have more young people, uninterested by religion which has always favored the Republicans… But no, you decided to go with a lot of people being on welfare in cities…. which is probably taken out of your ass since rural areas are usually poorer than cities.

    And by the way your translator didnt work very well because that is not exactly what I said.. ahahahah

    By travelingmaniac on May 19, 2009

  4. Cities vote democrat because they have more people living on the government dole. …You know, all those very well educated and worldly welfare mothers.

    The Dems trot them out like chattel on election day and then shove them back into their slums for another 4 years. It’s sad the way they use generation after generation of the poor. Exploiting them to grow government and expand their own power.

    P.S. – Speaking French doesn’t make you smart, but thinking so makes you and asshole.

    By Pappy76248 on May 19, 2009

  5. Well I actually know that you would vote for Palin… That is enough to figure out you are delusional or lowly educated.

    Et tu parles surement pas français.. peut-être un peu espagnol.. ce qui fait que oui. .je suis plus smart que toi.

    It’s pretty obvious that more educated people will vote for Dems and are liberals, except for business men who the Republicans really like to give freedom and taxes cut to. Otherwise why would all the uni filled cities would be blue all the way up to 70%?

    By travelingmaniac on May 19, 2009

  6. Let me fill you in, being liberal doesn’t automatically make you smarter and the assumption that you are smarter makes you close-minded.

    By Pappy76248 on May 19, 2009

  7. You don’t think you are close-minded? Re-read your comments, you’ve accused me of being lowly educated, even though you have no idea what education level I’ve achieved. In fact, you don’t know anything about me, but you decided at some point that when people disagree with you, they are not as smart as you. THEY have the problem, not you. Sound close-minded?

    By Pappy76248 on May 19, 2009

  8. Good point, winning is the most important thing and O-bah-ma’s sheep did win. Personal responsibility, national security, restrainted spending…those issues are not important, but winning with a made for T.V. president. Now that’s important!

    Second on the list would be setting up your empty suit winner with a teleprompter preloaded with 10,000 nit-wit approved sound bites.

    This video sets up Sarah as the parrot, but Obama is the one still squawking “we inherited it, we inherited it.”

    By Pappy76248 on May 19, 2009

  9. Dude, seriously.. I’ll come back to the point.. if you are blind enough to be for Palin (and also blind to see that you will lose in 2012 if she is there).. then you lose all credibility.. period

    By travelingmaniac on May 19, 2009

  10. P.S. – Wanting a smaller, less-intrusive government is not the same as wanting slavery to return, and when you draw that comparison you insult every person that went through that horror of and fought to end that terrible chapter in American History.

    Those are not equivalent positions and trying to pretend they are desecrates the memory of people that spent their lives fighting for equality. Sometime you might try reading up on Dred Scott instead of following Geneen Garofalo’s talking points.

    By Pappy76248 on May 19, 2009

  11. Did I call you racist, sexist or homophobic? no.. it’s just you thinking I did.

    By travelingmaniac on May 19, 2009

  12. First, Obama CAN NOT fix every problem in the world (and he shouldn’t be trying), so making an empty argument based on my feeling (which you don’t know) is irrelevant. He can’t spend his way out of our debt and he is VERY quickly running out of our money.

    Now, what’s funny with Dems is they only paint with one color. People like you ALWAYS drop to the same ole fall back position. When someone disagrees, call them a racist and sexist, if that doesn’t work…throw in homo-phobe.

    By Pappy76248 on May 19, 2009

  13. What’s funny with you republicans is that, even if Obama would fix every single problems in the entire world, you would still be against him because you are deadly afraid of the concepts he favors.

    You say “desperation to appear progressive”… guess what? Some people actually noticed that progression made the world like it is today. These same people are smart enough to see it’s better to go forward than backwards. Or you would rather go back to slavery and women having no rights…?

    By travelingmaniac on May 19, 2009

  14. No I think 60 million of you guys are plain idiots. Something the entire world has figured out yet… You know you are pretty much the only western country in which Palin would have a shot?

    And you just proved my point by putting the words “closed mind” and “liberal” together.. Do you even know what liberals are or you just were fed some crap since you were born about that? Again, proved because you used the word “socialism”. You are basically just one more of those low educated conservative..

    By travelingmaniac on May 19, 2009

  15. Considering Obama won I don’t think you meant to thank “goodness.” Maybe you meant to thank David Axelrod, Stalin, or Beelzebub. No matter whom, surely goodness had little to do with it.

    Though, you could give a nod to liberal white guilt. Iowa propelled Capt. socialism through the primaries. Few would argue the desperation to appear progressive wasn’t a factor. Still, “goodness” …No, not goodness. That’s not what sent Obama to Washington.

    By Pappy76248 on May 19, 2009

  16. Closed eyes, closed ears, closed mind, EXACTLY what I would expect from a liberal (or Canadian). You think everyone is like you? You think 60 million of us showed up at the polls for the fun of it? You think everyone likes the express train to socialism?

    Millions of us are counting the days until 2010, and 2012.

    As far as Sarah Palin, I don’t know how she would have done as VP, and neither do you, but I doubt she would act like a titty baby every time she was criticized.
    cough*Obama*cough

    By Pappy76248 on May 19, 2009

  17. This video is so true. She really only had a few phrases she kept repeating. Track record of reform and mavericks were the two I hated. Thank goodness they lost.

    By jasonboh26 on May 19, 2009

  18. At lease when her teleprompter went out during her big speech, she was able to finish her speech without it! (Unlike Obama)

    By dishpanhanzs on May 19, 2009

  19. Wow.. are you one of the few that would actually vote for Palin????

    Hey guys.. I FOUND ONE!

    By travelingmaniac on May 19, 2009

  20. How are they different? How is squawking “We inherited it, we inherited it” over and over and over…and over different than Sarah Palin saying “Maverick” over and over?

    Oh wait, here’s a difference. Sarah Palin was on the campaign trail and gave the same stump speech in city after city because that is how campaigns work. Obama, Pelosi, Emmanuel, Reid, Gibbs, and Axelrod are squawking “We inherited it, we inherited it” because they only know how to campaign, not lead.

    By Pappy76248 on May 19, 2009

  21. XD
    I think I just wet my self

    By AlbinoFox53 on May 19, 2009

  22. What you do not get is that this is all she was able to say during the campaign… Not quite the same with the people you are mentioning.

    By travelingmaniac on May 19, 2009

  23. So she’s a parrot?

    How about those parrot heads Obama, Pelosi, Emmanuel, Reid, Gibbs, Axelrod and every democrat in Washington squawking “We inherited it, we inherited it” over and over???

    By Pappy76248 on May 19, 2009

  24. Why not? Stupidity is running it now. ;)

    By NoBamaYoMamma on May 19, 2009

  25. cheerleader

    By wedapeepole on May 19, 2009

  26. palin wants a country LOL

    By Shumagaki on May 19, 2009

Post a Comment